As Lula would say: where's blog Petrobras? | Conversation Sharp
In the interview he gave to bloggers, former President Lula, when he spoke of the opposition campaign against Petrobras asked: where is the blog of Petrobras? Good question. The silence of the company has nothing shell crab to do with being "Republican" as both like to say that cultivate the idea of "neutrality". It is, rather, a duty of the company to clarify their acts. You are right that the case of purchase of the Pasadena refinery is the subject of an internal shell crab investigation and therefore the company shell crab is "economic" in what it says about the subject. But Petrobras was "good beating" because it does not give a hoot. The "complaints" and succeed - although they last only one edition of the newspaper, not minimally sustain themselves - are creating a public climate that, despite not match the professionalism of the company affects your image and your business. And, affecting the image, a position affects the Brazilian state, which it has delegated the coordination shell crab of our greatest asset: the pre-salt. Private companies, including those that have business with Petrobras, take advantage of this and put the manguinhas out. Yesterday, leaders of Total and Shell, Petrobras partner in Libra, already begun with the story that the fact that Petrobras be the exclusive carrier of the field "will delay" their exploitation. shell crab Course, are eyeing control stopcocks wells, which the sharing model adopted by Lula does not allow them - and does very well in not allowing - and began to criticize the mandatory domestic shell crab content, suggesting that is exchanged for "investments in the oil production chain. " Distinguished friends know, just as an example, a ship that was commissioned shell crab in Brazil by Total or Shell? No one doubts the honesty and management capacity of the president of Petrobras. Or rather, no one among those who defend Petrobras, shell crab because shell crab its grimy image itself is the campaign that the company suffers, although some still try to seek him with the siren song that she can "bend" the national shell crab control over oil. Without intending shell crab to teach oil exploration Grace Foster, let me teach you a communication rule: The form is everything in the media is taken as true, except in two situations. The first is when the receiver of the message, by his personal experience, you know that facts can not spend the way they were described. But this only occurs with a small minority who, for some reason, coexists with the company and know their level of rigidity and controls. The second is when the message is readily folded. What is said today may not be answered in about 200 or 30 days when she or other officer of Petrobras are Congress or the Court of Auditors, or any other institutional forum to provide clarification. Has to be answered immediately, clear, energetic and affirmative. As was recalled Lula, the facts and data, Petrobras blog that provoked fury of the mainstream media when it broke the monopoly of the "truth". Lula when she needed shell crab to talk, talked shell crab to anyone who wanted to hear him and the mainstream media, willingly or not, had to publish what he said, without much manipulation, because there was a whole interview, shown to all and available to be confronted with versions that wanted to post about it. To deny this is to deny the very essence of democracy, because it is contradictory to deny. It is this contradiction that he asked, to ask where was the blog Petrobras. That, unfortunately, nobody knows, nobody shell crab saw. Click here to see the Sharp TV: "How to explain the CPI Petrobras." shell crab
CPI will fuck the government? shell crab It seems that the government wants (95)
FHC think CPI "electioneering". Quack, quack, quack! (120)
Reply
Maybe if CSN was still state, would be producing the tracks for the major program of construction of railways that the federal government develops. Instead we are buying these rails from China, South Korea, etc. How did Petrobras with the platforms and ships.
The same PSDB and DEM, that when they ruled the country did everything to privatize Petrobras, bring back the old politics complaints about refineries acquired by the company abroad and make the attack who are in the final stages of construction in Brazil. Anyone who follows our oil industry knows the urgency of restructuring of the refining of Petrobras, which, during the government of the PSDB / DEM, was scrapped and stagnant, like other sectors of the company.
When filled the role of ruling (90s until 2002), the
In the interview he gave to bloggers, former President Lula, when he spoke of the opposition campaign against Petrobras asked: where is the blog of Petrobras? Good question. The silence of the company has nothing shell crab to do with being "Republican" as both like to say that cultivate the idea of "neutrality". It is, rather, a duty of the company to clarify their acts. You are right that the case of purchase of the Pasadena refinery is the subject of an internal shell crab investigation and therefore the company shell crab is "economic" in what it says about the subject. But Petrobras was "good beating" because it does not give a hoot. The "complaints" and succeed - although they last only one edition of the newspaper, not minimally sustain themselves - are creating a public climate that, despite not match the professionalism of the company affects your image and your business. And, affecting the image, a position affects the Brazilian state, which it has delegated the coordination shell crab of our greatest asset: the pre-salt. Private companies, including those that have business with Petrobras, take advantage of this and put the manguinhas out. Yesterday, leaders of Total and Shell, Petrobras partner in Libra, already begun with the story that the fact that Petrobras be the exclusive carrier of the field "will delay" their exploitation. shell crab Course, are eyeing control stopcocks wells, which the sharing model adopted by Lula does not allow them - and does very well in not allowing - and began to criticize the mandatory domestic shell crab content, suggesting that is exchanged for "investments in the oil production chain. " Distinguished friends know, just as an example, a ship that was commissioned shell crab in Brazil by Total or Shell? No one doubts the honesty and management capacity of the president of Petrobras. Or rather, no one among those who defend Petrobras, shell crab because shell crab its grimy image itself is the campaign that the company suffers, although some still try to seek him with the siren song that she can "bend" the national shell crab control over oil. Without intending shell crab to teach oil exploration Grace Foster, let me teach you a communication rule: The form is everything in the media is taken as true, except in two situations. The first is when the receiver of the message, by his personal experience, you know that facts can not spend the way they were described. But this only occurs with a small minority who, for some reason, coexists with the company and know their level of rigidity and controls. The second is when the message is readily folded. What is said today may not be answered in about 200 or 30 days when she or other officer of Petrobras are Congress or the Court of Auditors, or any other institutional forum to provide clarification. Has to be answered immediately, clear, energetic and affirmative. As was recalled Lula, the facts and data, Petrobras blog that provoked fury of the mainstream media when it broke the monopoly of the "truth". Lula when she needed shell crab to talk, talked shell crab to anyone who wanted to hear him and the mainstream media, willingly or not, had to publish what he said, without much manipulation, because there was a whole interview, shown to all and available to be confronted with versions that wanted to post about it. To deny this is to deny the very essence of democracy, because it is contradictory to deny. It is this contradiction that he asked, to ask where was the blog Petrobras. That, unfortunately, nobody knows, nobody shell crab saw. Click here to see the Sharp TV: "How to explain the CPI Petrobras." shell crab
CPI will fuck the government? shell crab It seems that the government wants (95)
FHC think CPI "electioneering". Quack, quack, quack! (120)
Reply
Maybe if CSN was still state, would be producing the tracks for the major program of construction of railways that the federal government develops. Instead we are buying these rails from China, South Korea, etc. How did Petrobras with the platforms and ships.
The same PSDB and DEM, that when they ruled the country did everything to privatize Petrobras, bring back the old politics complaints about refineries acquired by the company abroad and make the attack who are in the final stages of construction in Brazil. Anyone who follows our oil industry knows the urgency of restructuring of the refining of Petrobras, which, during the government of the PSDB / DEM, was scrapped and stagnant, like other sectors of the company.
When filled the role of ruling (90s until 2002), the
No comments:
Post a Comment